Home  ›  Things Scrubed From the Internet Never Heard of Again

Things Scrubed From the Internet Never Heard of Again

Written By Saturday, 14 May 2022 Add Comment Edit

Phenomenon that attempting to hide information attracts more attention to it

The original epitome of Barbra Streisand's residence in Malibu, which she attempted to suppress in 2003

The Streisand result is a phenomenon that occurs when an attempt to hide, remove, or censor data has the unintended consequence of increasing awareness of that information, often via the Cyberspace. Information technology is named after American singer Barbra Streisand, whose endeavor to suppress the California Coastal Records Project'due south photograph of her residence in Malibu, California, taken to document California coastal erosion, inadvertently drew greater attention to the photograph in 2003.[1]

Attempts to suppress information are oftentimes fabricated through terminate-and-desist letters, but instead of being suppressed, the information receives extensive publicity, as well as media extensions such as videos and spoof songs, which can be mirrored on the Internet or distributed on file-sharing networks.[2] [3]

The Streisand effect is an example of psychological reactance, wherein once people are aware that some information is being kept from them, they are significantly more motivated to access and spread that information.[four]

In some cases, seeking or obtaining an injunction to prohibit something from being published leads to increased publicity.

Etymology [edit]

Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the term in 2005 afterward a vacation resort issued a takedown notice to urinal.net (a site dedicated to photographs of urinals) over its use of the resort'southward proper noun.[5] [6]

How long is information technology going to take before lawyers realize that the simple act of trying to repress something they don't similar online is likely to make it and then that something that most people would never, ever see (like a photograph of a urinal in some random embankment resort) is now seen by many more than people? Permit's phone call it the Streisand Effect.[6]

The term alluded to Barbra Streisand, who in 2003 had sued lensman Kenneth Adelman and Pictopia.com for violation of privacy.[vii] [eight] The US$50 million lawsuit endeavored to remove an aerial photo of Streisand's mansion from the publicly available drove of 12,000 California coastline photographs.[two] [9] [ten] Adelman photographed the beachfront property to document coastal erosion every bit part of the California Coastal Records Projection, which was intended to influence authorities policymakers.[11] [12] Before Streisand filed her lawsuit, "Paradigm 3850" had been downloaded from Adelman's website merely six times; two of those downloads were past Streisand's attorneys.[13] As a result of the case, public knowledge of the picture increased greatly; more 420,000 people visited the site over the following month.[14] The lawsuit was dismissed and Streisand was ordered to pay Adelman'south legal fees, which amounted to $155,567.[15] [16] [17]

Examples [edit]

In politics and regime [edit]

In Nov 2007, Tunisia blocked access to YouTube and Dailymotion after material was posted depicting Tunisian political prisoners. Activists and their supporters so started to link the location of then-President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali's palace on Google Earth to videos most ceremonious liberties in full general. The Economist said this "turned a low-key human-rights story into a fashionable global entrada".[18]

The French intelligence agency DCRI's deletion of the French-language Wikipedia article about the war machine radio station of Pierre-sur-Haute[19] resulted in the restored article temporarily condign the most-viewed page on the French Wikipedia.[twenty]

A 2013 libel suit past Theodore Katsanevas against a Greek Wikipedia editor resulted in members of the project bringing the story to the attention of journalists.[21]

The government of South Africa stated their intention to ban the 2017 volume The President'southward Keepers, detailing abuse within the government of then-President Jacob Zuma. This caused sales of the book to spike dramatically, causing the book to sell out inside 24 hours earlier the ban was to be put into effect.[22] [23] This made the book a national best seller and led to multiple reprints.

In February 2018, Anne Applebaum wrote in The Washington Post about the Polish Holocaust law, which would take criminalized blaming Poles for the Holocaust. She argued that the Streisand consequence would depict more attention to aspects of history that the Polish government preferred to suppress.[24] The legislation is part of the historical policy of the Police and Justice party which seeks to present a narrative of ethnic Poles exclusively as victims and heroes.[25] [26] [27] The law met with widespread international criticism, equally it was seen equally an infringement on liberty of expression and on academic freedom, and equally a bulwark to open discussion on Polish collaborationism,[25] [28] [29] in what has been described as "the biggest diplomatic crisis in [Poland's] recent history".[30]

A 2018 study of millions of private responses of Chinese social media users found that sudden censorship of data past the Chinese regime and its affiliates often led to mass backlashes, including newfound popularity of VPNs and the subsequent reviewing of unabridged topic lists on which censored subjects announced.[31] Other researchers found that the backlash tended to event in permanent changes to political attitudes and behaviors.[32]

A 2019 study of political imprisonment by the regime of Kingdom of saudi arabia found that while the incarceration tended to deter individual dissidents from further dissent, it strongly emboldened their social media followers, led to a sharp increase in calls for political reform, and resulted in an increment in online dissent and physical in-person protests overall, including criticism of the ruling family unit and calls for regime change.[33] Such repression draws public attention to the imprisoned dissidents and their causes, and did not deter other prominent figures in Saudi Arabia from continuing to dissent online.[34]

In March 2019, US (California) Representative Devin Nunes filed a defamation lawsuit confronting Twitter and three users for US$250 1000000 in damages. One user named in the lawsuit, the parody account @DevinCow (Proper name: Devin Nunes' cow), had 1,200 followers before the lawsuit. The number of followers of @DevinCow soon jumped to 600,000.[35]

In August 2020, it was reported that the Chinese government had blanked out parts of its Baidu mapping platform, and that this could be used to notice a network of buildings bearing hallmarks of prisons and internment camps.[36]

In October 2020, the New York Post published emails from a laptop endemic by Presidential candidate Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden, detailing an alleged corruption scheme.[37] Twitter blocked the story from their platform and locked the accounts of those who shared a link to the article, including the New York Mail service 's own Twitter business relationship, and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, among others.[38] Researchers at MIT cited the increase of 5.5 thousand shares every 15 minutes to about 10 thousand shares shortly after Twitter censored the story, as evidence of the Streisand Issue near doubling the attention the story received.[39]

In March 2022, incumbent Australian federal MP Tim Wilson, in what had previously been considered to be the rubber seat of Goldstein, drew national attention to his independent challenger Zoe Daniel when he made legal objections to posting of entrada signs by volunteers on the fences of private residences.[40] This as well led to a pregnant increment in donations to the Daniel Campaign.[41]

By businesses [edit]

In April 2007, a group of companies that used Advanced Access Content Organization (AACS) encryption issued stop-and-desist letters enervating that the system's 128-bit (16-byte) numerical key (represented in hexadecimal as 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0) exist removed from several high-profile websites, including Digg. With the numerical key and some software, it was possible to decrypt the video content on HD-DVDs. This led to the key'south proliferation across other sites and conversation rooms in diverse formats, with i commentator describing it every bit having get "the most famous number on the Cyberspace".[42] Within a calendar month, the central had been reprinted on over 280,000 pages, had been printed on T-shirts and tattoos, had been published every bit a volume, and had appeared on YouTube in a song played over 45,000 times.[43]

In September 2009, multi-national oil company Trafigura obtained a super-injunction to preclude The Guardian newspaper from reporting on an internal Trafigura investigation into the 2006 Ivory coast toxic waste material dump scandal. A super-injunction prevents reporting on even the existence of the injunction. Using parliamentary privilege, Labour MP Paul Farrelly referred to the super-injunction in a parliamentary question, and on October 12, 2009, The Guardian reported that information technology had been gagged from reporting on the parliamentary question, in violation of the 1689 Pecker of Rights.[44] [45] Blogger Richard Wilson correctly identified the blocked question as referring to the Trafigura waste dump scandal, afterward which The Spectator suggested the same. Not long after, Trafigura began trending on Twitter, helped along by Stephen Fry's retweeting the story to his followers.[46] Twitter users soon tracked downward all details of the case, and by October sixteen, the super-injunction had been lifted and the report published.[47]

In November 2012, Casey Movers, a Boston moving visitor, threatened to sue a woman in Hingham Commune Courtroom for libel in response to a negative Yelp review. The woman'south husband wrote a weblog post about the situation, which was then picked up by Techdirt [48] and Consumerist.[49] By the end of the calendar week, the company was reviewed by the Amend Business concern Bureau, which after revoked its accreditation.[50]

In Dec 2013, YouTube user ghostlyrich uploaded video proof that his Samsung Galaxy S4 bombardment had spontaneously defenseless burn down. Samsung had demanded proof earlier honoring its warranty. Once Samsung learned of the YouTube video, it added additional atmospheric condition to its warranty, demanding ghostlyrich delete his YouTube video, promise not to upload similar textile, officially atone the company of all liability, waive his right to bring a lawsuit, and never make the terms of the agreement public. Samsung too demanded that a witness cosign the settlement proposal. When ghostlyrich shared Samsung's settlement proposal online, his original video drew 1.ii one thousand thousand views in one calendar week.[51] [52]

In August 2014, it was reported that Union Street Guest Business firm in Hudson, New York, had a policy that "there will be a $500 fine that will exist deducted from your eolith for every negative review of USGH [Union Street Invitee House] placed on any Net site by anyone in your political party and/or attending your wedding or event."[53] The policy had been used in an attempt to suppress an unfavorable November 2013 Yelp review.[54] Thousands of negative reviews of the policy were posted to Yelp and other review sites.[55]

In September 2018, The Verge, an American technology news and media network operated by Voice Media, published an article titled "How to Build a Custom PC for Editing, Gaming or Coding" and uploaded a video to YouTube titled "How we Built a $2000 Custom Gaming PC", which was widely criticized for its instructions that would have been harmful or dangerous to both the computer and user if followed, and its numerous factual errors, such as challenge anti-vibration pads were for electric insulation, and confusing zip ties with tweezers.[56] [57] In February 2019, Vox Media started issuing DMCA takedown notices to YouTube channels which posted content using clips from the video, most notably to technology channels Bitwit and ReviewTechUSA,[56] [58] bringing further attention to the video and the related content they attempted to suppress.[56] Subsequently an outcry post-obit the decision, YouTube reinstated these 2 videos, along with retracting the copyright "strikes" practical.[59]

On 20 February 2020, Apple filed a legal complaint against the sales of the German language-language volume App Shop Confidential, written by a former German App Store managing director, Tom Sadowski. Apple tree cited confidential concern information as the reason for requesting the sales ban. However, the publicity brought on by the media acquired the book to reach number two on the Amazon bestseller list in Federal republic of germany. The book was presently on its second print run.[60]

In October 2020, the RIAA filed a DMCA takedown against the youtube-dl repository on GitHub, resulting in the repository and several forks beingness taken downwardly. Inside days, hundreds of forks of the repository appeared on GitHub.[61]

By other organizations [edit]

In Jan 2008, The Church building of Scientology'south attempts to get Internet websites to delete a video of Tom Cruise speaking well-nigh Scientology resulted in the cosmos of Project Chanology.[62] [63] [64]

On December 5, 2008, the Internet Lookout Foundation (IWF) added the English Wikipedia article almost the 1976 Scorpions album Virgin Killer to a child pornography blacklist, considering the album's embrace fine art "a potentially illegal indecent image of a child under the age of xviii".[62] The article quickly became 1 of the most popular pages on the site,[65] and the publicity surrounding the IWF action resulted in the image existence spread across other sites.[66] The IWF was later reported on the BBC News website to have said "IWF's overriding objective is to minimise the availability of indecent images of children on the Cyberspace, however, on this occasion our efforts take had the opposite effect".[67] This event was likewise noted past the IWF in its statement most the removal of the URL from the blacklist.[68] [69]

In June 2012, Argyll and Bute Council in Scotland banned a nine-year-one-time main school pupil from updating her blog, NeverSeconds, with photos of lunchtime meals served in the school's canteen. The web log, which was already popular, started receiving a big number of views due to the international media furor that followed the ban. Inside days, the council reversed its decision under immense public pressure level and scrutiny. After the reversal of the ban, the web log became more popular than it was before.[seventy]

By individuals [edit]

In May 2011, Premier League footballer Ryan Giggs sued Twitter subsequently a user revealed that Giggs was the subject of an anonymous privacy injunction (informally referred to as a "super-injunction"[71]) that prevented the publication of details regarding an alleged matter with model and former Big Blood brother contestant Imogen Thomas. A blogger for the Forbes website observed that the British media, which were banned from breaking the terms of the injunction, had mocked the footballer for non agreement the effect.[72] Dan Sabbagh from The Guardian later posted a graph detailing—without naming the player—the number of references to the player's name confronting time, showing a large spike following the news that the thespian was seeking legal activity.[73]

Like situations involving super-injunctions in England and Wales take occurred, one involving Jeremy Clarkson.[74] Since January 2016 a celebrity (later revealed exterior England and Wales to be David Furnish) used the injunction granted in PJS v News Grouping Newspapers to preclude media in England and Wales reporting events that have been featured in Scottish media and on the Internet.[75] [76]

A satirical play, 2 Brothers and the Lions, was written by French playwright Hédi Tillette de Clermont-Tonnerre, about two wealthy British people who live in a castle on the Aqueduct Island of Brecqhou, "who go cold, selfish monsters in the heart of our democratic societies". In reality the billionaire Barclay brothers, owners of the Daily Telegraph paper among other holdings, alive in a castle on the island. David Barclay sued the playwright in France for defamation and invasion of privacy, though the Barclays were not named in the play. The playwright'south lawyer described the play as "a satirical legend on capitalism". Tillette de Clermont-Tonnerre best-selling that the play was partly inspired by the lives of the brothers. But he said it roughshod inside his right to freedom of expression, and said the play had been commissioned to explore the consequence of the continued being of mediaeval Norman constabulary in the Aqueduct Islands, while ruminating on the nature and hereafter of capitalism. In July 2019 Barclay lost the case. The play had been obscure and simply played in modest theatres, though critically acclaimed; afterward the lawsuit performances were scheduled in cities across France.[77]

Luke O'Neill, an Irish immunologist writing in The Guardian,[78] opined that Bret Stephens, an American Pulitzer Prize winning announcer, in 2019 achieved "as shut to the perfect Streisand issue as one could imagine" by writing an email to David Karpf, an acquaintance professor of media and public affairs, whose tweet calling Stephens a "bedbug" had attracted insignificant interest, saying "I'm often amazed virtually the things supposedly decent people are prepared to say nigh other people — people they've never met — on Twitter. I remember you've set a new standard."; Stephens cc'd on the email the provost of George Washington University at which Karpf worked. Karpf retaliated against Stephens, by posting the email publicly on Twitter, and by writing an op ed criticizing Stephens in the Los Angeles Times.[79] [fourscore] Stephens was mocked on Twitter, deleted his Twitter account, and the story was picked up by media.[81] [80] [82]

The Streisand result has been observed in relation to the right to be forgotten, the right in some jurisdictions to have private information about a person removed from internet searches and other directories under some circumstances, as a litigant attempting to remove information from search engines risks the litigation itself being reported as valid, electric current news.[83] [84]

In 2019 author Andrew Seidel sent a re-create of his volume The Founding Myth: Why Christian Nationalism Is Un-American to bourgeois evangelical pastor Greg Locke in the hope of starting a chat about the issues discussed in it. Locke said that he had no intention of reading the book, and burnt it, posting video of the called-for on his social media accounts. Response to the video included many replies expressing the intention to purchase and read the book, and to donate copies to libraries.[85]

See also [edit]

  • Banned in Boston – Phrase used to draw a work prohibited in Boston
  • Blowback (intelligence) – Unintended consequence of covert operations, typically involving rogue terrorist groups
  • DSMA-Observe – Great britain request to not publish information (popularly known as a "D notice")
  • Gag order – Legal lodge to restrict publication
  • Hydra effect – Paradox originating from the Greek legend of the Lernaean Hydra
  • List of eponymous laws – Adages and sayings named subsequently a person
    • Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority 5. Anderson – Activity to block publication of vulnerability
    • The History of Sexuality – Four-volume book by Michel Foucault
  • McLibel case – Legal action against and by activists
  • Perverse incentive – Incentive that has an contrary issue ("Cobra upshot")
  • Reactance (psychology) – Unpleasant emotion experienced when behavioral freedom is threatened
  • Red triangle (Aqueduct 4) – Developed content warning
  • Imperial Family unit (film)
  • Strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) – Litigation to silence critics
  • Succès de scandale – Term meaning "success from scandal"
  • Super-injunctions – In England and Wales, injunctions whose existence and details may not be legally reported, in addition to facts or allegations which may not be disclosed

References [edit]

  1. ^ "The Streisand Effect". Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam Webster lexicon. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
  2. ^ a b Canton, David (November v, 2005). "Today's Business concern Law: Try to suppress can backfire". London Gratis Press. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved July 21, 2007. The 'Streisand effect' is what happens when someone tries to suppress something and the opposite occurs. The act of suppressing it raises the profile, making information technology much more well known than it ever would accept been.
  3. ^ Mugrabi, Sunshine (January 22, 2007). "YouTube – Censored? Offending Paula Abdul clips are abruptly taken downward". Red Herring. Archived from the original on February 18, 2007. Retrieved July 21, 2007. Some other unintended consequence of this movement could exist that it extends the kerfuffle over Ms. Abdul's behavior rather than quelling it. Mr. Nguyen chosen this the 'Barbra Streisand effect', referring to that actress's insistence that paparazzi photos of her mansion not exist used
  4. ^ Burnett, Dean (May 22, 2015). "Why authorities censorship [in no way at all] carries greater risks than benefits". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
  5. ^ Siegel, Robert (February 29, 2008). "The Streisand Effect' Snags Effort to Hibernate Documents". All Things Considered. NPR. Archived from the original on March 6, 2018. The episode is the latest example of a phenomenon known as the 'Streisand Effect.' Robert Siegel talks with Mike Masnick, CEO of Techdirt Inc., who coined the term.
  6. ^ a b Masnick, Mike (January 8, 2015). "For 10 Years Everyone's Been Using 'The Streisand Effect' Without Paying; At present I'm Going to Starting time Issuing Takedowns". Techdirt. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved April sixteen, 2016.
  7. ^ Barbara Streisand v. Kenneth Adelman Et. Al. , Cal.Super. (Superior Court of California, Canton of Los Angeles v/xx/2003)No. SC077257
  8. ^ "The perils of the Streisand Effect". BBC News Magazine. July 31, 2014. Archived from the original on Jan 13, 2016.
  9. ^ Bernoff, Josh; Li, Charlene (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a Earth Transformed by Social Technologies . Boston: Harvard Business School Printing. p. seven. ISBN978-1-4221-2500-7.
  10. ^ "Since When Is It Illegal to Simply Mention a Trademark Online?". Techdirt. Archived from the original on November 30, 2012.
  11. ^ "Barbra Sues Over Aerial Photos". The Smoking Gun. May 30, 2003. Archived from the original on April 17, 2011. Retrieved November 22, 2010.
  12. ^ "California Littoral Records Project". californiacoastline.org. Archived from the original on April 7, 2008.
  13. ^ Tentative ruling, page six, stating, "Image 3850 was download six times, twice to the Internet accost of counsel for plaintiff". In addition, two prints of the motion-picture show were ordered—ane by Streisand's counsel and i by Streisand's neighbour. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on August 24, 2015. Retrieved September 24, 2014. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived re-create as championship (link)
  14. ^ Rogers, Paul (June 24, 2003). "Photo of Streisand home becomes an Internet hit". San Jose Mercury News, mirrored at californiacoastline.org. Archived from the original on July 30, 2013. Retrieved June 15, 2007.
  15. ^ Streisand v. Adelman, et al., in California Superior Court; Case SC077257
  16. ^ Adelman, Kenneth (May xiii, 2007). "Barbra Streisand Sues to Suppress Gratuitous Speech Protection for Widely Acclaimed Website". California Littoral Records Project. Archived from the original on Apr 7, 2008. Retrieved April viii, 2008.
  17. ^ "Streisand'southward Lawsuit to Silence Coastal Website Dismissed" (Press release). Mindfully.org. December three, 2003. Archived from the original on July vi, 2009. Retrieved April eight, 2008.
  18. ^ "Blog standard: Authoritarian governments can lock up bloggers. It is harder to outwit them". The Economist. June 26, 2008. Archived from the original on January 24, 2011. Retrieved Dec 6, 2010. WHAT do Barbra Streisand and the Tunisian president, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, accept in common? They both tried to block material they dislike from actualization on the cyberspace.
  19. ^ Communiqué from the Wikimedia Foundation, April half-dozen, 2013[ circular reference ]
  20. ^ Geuss, Megan. "Wikipedia editor allegedly forced by French intelligence to delete "classified" entry". Archived from the original on April eight, 2013. Retrieved Apr six, 2013.
  21. ^ Sampson, Tim (February 19, 2014). "Greek politician who sued Wikipedia editor clearly never heard of the Streisand Effect". Daily Dot. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016.
  22. ^ Watson, Amanda (November six, 2017). "Pauw's new volume is in the public interest". The Citizen . Retrieved Baronial 18, 2018.
  23. ^ "First twenty,000 'The President's Keepers' books sold". enca.com. November 5, 2017. Retrieved November 7, 2017.
  24. ^ Applebaum, Anne (Feb 2, 2018). "The stupidity and unenforceability of Poland's speech police force". The Washington Post . Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  25. ^ a b Hackmann, Jörg (2018). "Defending the 'Good Proper name' of the Polish Nation: Politics of History as a Battlefield in Poland, 2015–xviii". Periodical of Genocide Research. xx (4): 587–606. doi:x.1080/14623528.2018.1528742. S2CID 81922100.
  26. ^ Poland's Ramble Breakup, Wojciech Sadurski, Oxford Academy Press, page 155
  27. ^ Soroka, George; Krawatzek, Félix (2019). "Nationalism, Democracy, and Retention Laws". Journal of Democracy. 30 (ii): 157–171. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0032. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 159294126.
  28. ^ Noack, Rick (Feb ii, 2018). "Poland'southward Senate passes Holocaust complicity bill despite concerns from U.S., Israel". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  29. ^ Ray, Larry; Kapralski, Sławomir (2019). "Introduction to the special issue – disputed Holocaust memory in Poland". Holocaust Studies. 25 (3): 209–219. doi:ten.1080/17504902.2019.1567657.
  30. ^ Cherviatsova, Alina (2020). "Memory as a battleground: European memorial laws and liberty of spoken communication". The International Journal of Human Rights. 25 (four): 675–694. doi:10.1080/13642987.2020.1791826. S2CID 225574752.
  31. ^ Hobbs, William R.; Roberts, Margaret E. (Baronial 2018). "How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Data". American Political Science Review. 112 (3): 621–636. doi:x.1017/S0003055418000084. ISSN 0003-0554.
  32. ^ Chen, Yuyu; Yang, David Y. (2018). "The Touch on of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in People's republic of china" (PDF). Graduate School of Business. Stanford University. Retrieved February 15, 2020.
  33. ^ Pan, Jennifer; Siegel, Alexandra A. (February 2020). "How Saudi Crackdowns Fail to Silence Online Dissent" (PDF). American Political Scientific discipline Review. 114 (ane): 109–125. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000650. ISSN 0003-0554. S2CID 204964643. Retrieved February xv, 2020.
  34. ^ Pan, Jennifer and Siegel (Jan 3, 2020). "Replication Data for: How Saudi Crackdowns Fail to Silence Online Dissent". American Political Science Review. Harvard Dataverse. doi:ten.7910/DVN/9AMKHL.
  35. ^ Holson, Laura (March 20, 2019). "After Devin Nunes Sues @DevinCow, the Twitter Parody Gains a One-half-Million Followers". The New York Times . Retrieved September 8, 2020.
  36. ^ Masnick, Mike. "Mainland china'southward Efforts To Hide Its Muslim Concentration Camps Helped Reporters To Observe Them". TechDirt . Retrieved August 31, 2020.
  37. ^ Morris, Emma-Jo; Fonrouge, Gabrielle (October xiv, 2020). "Smoking-gun e-mail reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian man of affairs to VP dad". New York Post . Retrieved October 20, 2020.
  38. ^ "Twitter bans ads from RT and Sputnik over election interference". The Guardian. Oct 26, 2017. Retrieved April fourteen, 2022. Company announced decision post-obit United states of america intelligence community'south conclusion that Russian media outlets sought to interfere with the Us election
  39. ^ "Twitter'southward ban almost doubled attention for Biden misinformation". MIT Technology Review . Retrieved Oct twenty, 2020.
  40. ^ "Memo to political campaigners: retrieve Barbra Streisand's mansion". Retrieved March 26, 2022.
  41. ^ "Hey Tim Wilson MP, On Wed, you tried to plough neighbour against neighbour". Retrieved March eleven, 2022.
  42. ^ Stone, Brad (May 3, 2007). "In Web Uproar, Antipiracy Code Spreads Wildly". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. The ironic thing is, because they tried to quiet it downwards information technology'southward the most famous number on the Net.
  43. ^ Greenberg, Andy (May 11, 2007). "The Streisand Issue". Forbes. Archived from the original on March 7, 2008. Retrieved February 29, 2008. The phenomenon takes its name from Barbra Streisand, who made her ain ill-fated try at reining in the Web in 2003. That'southward when environmental activist Kenneth Adelman posted aerial photos of Streisand's Malibu beach house on his Spider web site as office of an environmental survey, and she responded past suing him for $50 1000000. Until the lawsuit, few people had spotted Streisand'south house, Adelman says—simply the lawsuit brought more than a meg visitors to Adelman's Web site, he estimates. Streisand's case was dismissed, and Adelman's photo was picked upwardly by the Associated Press and reprinted in newspapers around the world.
  44. ^ Leigh, David (Oct 12, 2009). "Guardian gagged from reporting parliament". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on Oct 5, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  45. ^ Leigh, David (October 13, 2009). "Guardian seeks urgent court hearing over parliament reporting gag". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on Oct v, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  46. ^ Jacobson, Seth. "Twitter claims new scalp as Trafigura backs down". The First Post. Archived from the original on August 28, 2010. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  47. ^ Beckford, Martin; Watt, Holly (Oct 16, 2009). "Secret Trafigura report said 'probable cause' of illness was release of toxic gas from dumped waste material". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on July 31, 2017.
  48. ^ Masnick, Mike. "Latest Visitor to Observe the Streisand Result: Casey Movers". Techdirt. Archived from the original on Nov 17, 2012. Retrieved November 15, 2012.
  49. ^ Moran, Chris. "Moving Company Picks The Wrong Person To Threaten To Sue Over Bad Yelp Review". Consumerist. Archived from the original on Nov sixteen, 2012. Retrieved November xiv, 2012.
  50. ^ "Casey Moving Company". Ameliorate Business organisation Bureau. Archived from the original on November eleven, 2013. Retrieved September 17, 2013.
  51. ^ Klee, Miles. "Samsung'south Response to a Client whose Telephone Caught Fire But Made Things Worse". Daily Dot. Archived from the original on Dec 11, 2013. Retrieved December 9, 2013.
  52. ^ Levy, Gabrielle (December 11, 2013). "S4 catches fire, Samsung tries to silence written report". United Press International. Archived from the original on December 24, 2013. Retrieved December 23, 2013.
  53. ^ Siegler, Mara (August 4, 2014). "Hotel fines $500 for every bad review posted online". Page Six, New York Postal service. Archived from the original on August 18, 2014. Retrieved Baronial eighteen, 2014.
  54. ^ Simon R. (2013). "Union Street Invitee House: Hudson, NY (review)". Yelp. Archived from the original on August 19, 2014. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
  55. ^ "This Hotel Fines Customers $500 for Bad Reviews (Yes, There's a Better Approach)". Forbes. Archived from the original on August xix, 2014. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
  56. ^ a b c Lee, Timothy B. (Feb 20, 2019). "Vox lawyers briefly censored YouTubers who mocked The Verge'south bad PC build advice". Ars Technica . Retrieved Feb 21, 2019.
  57. ^ Megalith. "[H]ardOCP: The Verge Ridiculed for "How We Built a $2000 Custom Gaming PC" Video". [H]ard|OCP . Retrieved February 13, 2019.
  58. ^ Medley, Sam (February 15, 2019). "The Verge issues copyright claims confronting multiple YouTube videos criticizing its infamous PC build video". Notebookcheck . Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  59. ^ Knight, Shawn (February 14, 2019). "Vox Media targets YouTuber that parodied The Verge's terrible PC build video". TechSpot. Retrieved February 16, 2018.
  60. ^ Lovejoy, Ben (February 21, 2020). "New Apple tree volume hits #2 on German bestseller list following attempted ban". 9to5Mac.
  61. ^ "Angry YouTube-dl users flood GitHub with new repos after takedown". BleepingComputer.
  62. ^ a b Arthur, Charles (March 20, 2009). "The Streisand consequence: Secrecy in the digital historic period". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on September 6, 2013. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
  63. ^ "The Streisand Effect: When Internet Censorship Backfires". Complex. July 24, 2009. Archived from the original on April 29, 2010. Retrieved April 27, 2010.
  64. ^ "What is 'The Streisand Effect'?". The Daily Telegraph. London. January 31, 2009. Archived from the original on June 8, 2011. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
  65. ^ Metz, Cade (December 7, 2008). "Brit ISPs censor Wikipedia over 'child porn' album cover". The Register. Archived from the original on June viii, 2011. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
  66. ^ Moses, Asher (December 8, 2008). "Wikipedia added to kid pornography blacklist". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on September 17, 2012. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
  67. ^ "IWF backs downward on Wiki censorship". BBC News. Dec 9, 2008. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. Retrieved Dec 9, 2008.
  68. ^ "Living with the Streisand Effect". International Herald Tribune. December 26, 2008. Archived from the original on Jan 14, 2009. Retrieved December 29, 2008.
  69. ^ "IWF statement regarding Wikipedia webpage" (Printing release). Internet Watch Foundation. December 9, 2008. Archived from the original on January one, 2011. Retrieved September 24, 2013.
  70. ^ Cacciottolo, Mario (June 15, 2012). "The Streisand Result: When censorship backfires". BBC News. Archived from the original on March eleven, 2016.
  71. ^ Townend, Judith (May 20, 2011). "Lord Neuberger'south report cuts through the superinjunction hysteria". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 22, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  72. ^ Hill, Kashmir (September xxx, 2009). "He-Who-Cannot-Be-Named (In The UK) Sues Twitter Over A User Naming Him". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 22, 2011. Retrieved May 21, 2011. Evidently, though, CTB'southward lawyers accept non heard of the "Streisand consequence".
  73. ^ Sabbagh, Dan (May 20, 2011). "Twitter and the mystery footballer". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 21, 2014. Retrieved May 24, 2011.
  74. ^ Garavelli, Dani (March 14, 2015). "End of the road for Clarkson?". The Scotsman. Archived from the original on Apr 25, 2016. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
  75. ^ "This celebrity injunction will probably rebound—a case of the 'Streisand effect'". The Guardian. London. April 11, 2016. Archived from the original on April fourteen, 2016. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
  76. ^ "British papers can report Furnish's infidelity". The Straits Times. April twenty, 2016. Retrieved Dec 11, 2018.
  77. ^ Waterson, Jim (July 3, 2019). "David Barclay loses libel case against obscure French playwright". The Guardian . Retrieved July iii, 2019.
  78. ^ "Luke O'Neill". The Guardian.
  79. ^ Karpf, David (August 28, 2019). "Op-Ed: I made a joke about Bret Stephens and bedbugs. His response was never most civility". Los Angeles Times.
  80. ^ a b Rupar, Aaron (August 27, 2019). "Bret Stephens'southward "bedbug" meltdown, explained". Vocalisation.
  81. ^ O'Neil, Luke (August 27, 2019). "NYT columnist quits Twitter afterwards daring critic to 'phone call me a bedbug to my confront'". The Guardian.
  82. ^ Mathis-Lilley, Ben (August 27, 2019). "A Q&A With the Man Who Called Bret Stephens a Bedbug". Slate.
  83. ^ "Google's right to exist forgotten creates Streisand event". Recombu. July 3, 2014. Archived from the original on December 8, 2014.
  84. ^ "Techno File: Exercising 'right to be forgotten' could spark 'Streisand consequence'". BDlive. July 23, 2014. Archived from the original on July 25, 2014.
  85. ^ Khan, Aysha (Oct 24, 2019). "Tennessee pastor posts video burning book that critiques Christian nationalism". Religion News Service. Archived from the original on February ane, 2021. Retrieved February i, 2021.

External links [edit]

  • "The perils of the Streisand effect". Parkinson, Justin. BBC News, July 31, 2014.

hollandwhatumbigh.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

0 Response to "Things Scrubed From the Internet Never Heard of Again"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel